The Rolling Stones: Hackney Diamonds Review

The Rolling Stones: Hackney Diamonds Review


โ€œThe past is never dead. Itโ€™s not even past.โ€ โ€“ Faulkner

Tell me about it. The Rolling Stones were releasing their new album and getting ready to tour, and the word on the street was mockery. The โ€œwrinkly rockersโ€ were lampooned for hitting the road in their โ€œsteel wheelchairsโ€, and roundly pilloried for still assuming themselves to be a going concern at their ridiculously advanced age.

In 1989.

They were in their 40s. A few years later, David Letterman would greet the Voodoo Lounge tour with a Top 10 List including gags about โ€œThe Rolling Stones Live, Plus Keith Richardsโ€, โ€œInstruments Hooked Up to the Clapper Tourโ€ and โ€œMetamusic.โ€ย  Keith was 51. And that was all in a previous century, and about a dozen albums ago.

What was that gag about the Stones being old? The Rolling Stones, in a central way, were old when they were young โ€” or, at least, wanted to be young or appear so. Mick Jagger met Keith Richards almost 62 years to the day on October 17, 1961, on Platform 2 of the Dartford train. Nineteen-year-old white English blues โ€œmenโ€, with a singer who was a pretty decent harmonica player, playing songs by Muddy Waters, Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Howlinโ€™ Wolf โ€” which is no mean feat, but they didnโ€™t even write their own songs.

That was a minute ago โ€” actually, a dozen albums ago, if you count the live ones. Since then, the Rolling Stones have continued to unprecedented pursuit of unprecedentedly continuing to exist. It is a feat that is likely to never be repeated. Madonna wonโ€™t tour at 80. Neither will Metallica or U2. Especially not U2, given itโ€™s the drummer who breaks down first. Except for Charlie Watts, of course. I mean, he died, but he was still the touring drummer when he did. Again, everything about the Rolling Stones is unprecedented.

Age isnโ€™t entirely a state of mind; thereโ€™s not much mental about crippling arthritis. But in terms of unprecedentedness, you can add that the bandโ€™s 26th studio album is their best since Lady Gaga was a toddler.

About that: when a band this famous andโ€ฆ established, releases an album, it cannot simply be a collection of great songs, especially when your greatest songs are behind you. It must be an event โ€” just ask U2. And so, Lady Gaga electrifies the absurdly massive song โ€œSweet Sounds of Heavenโ€, and we build around that. She is one of many guests, including Paul McCartney, Elton John, Stevie Wonder, Bill Wyman (!), Benmont Tench, and Rick Astley โ€“ okay, kidding about that last one, but why not?

After the last glitter of the gospel stunner has settled to the floor, one is left with the rockerz. As with most super-late career releases, the Stones are pro forma. Thereโ€™s nothing wrong with โ€œBite My Head Offโ€ (McCartneyโ€™s blown-speaker bass is great), โ€œWhole Wide Worldโ€ or โ€œMess It Upโ€, none of which is as ear-catching as โ€œAngryโ€, but the key test of any song is simple: are you listening if it isnโ€™t this band? Not to โ€œDriving Me Too Hardโ€ youโ€™re not. There are many nods to the past โ€” as is their right. I mean, itโ€™s their past, so โ€œGet Closeโ€ lifts the sense of โ€œCanโ€™t You Hear Me Knockingโ€.

Needless to say, the biggest thing missing is any kind of moving, emotional reflection of Charlie Wattsโ€™s passing. I mean, he was only their drummer forever, but thatโ€™s the Stones. They donโ€™t really do real heartbreak. Keef and Ronnie find more vitality in the olโ€™ Chuck licks than youโ€™d have imagined. โ€œLive By the Swordโ€ kicks off sounding like a disaster and swaggers into a patented mugging Jagger drawl: โ€œIโ€™m gonna treeeat you rii-iightโ€. And therein lies your lesson in Jaggerism. Put simply, the singer had the most at risk here, as he was well aware in โ€œDepending On Youโ€: โ€œIโ€™m too young to die / and too old to loseโ€.ย 

Indeed. Return to the fact that Hackney Diamonds is easily the best-sounding album of 2023, with producer Andrew Watt driving the Stones to tighten it up. Listen to โ€œDriving Me Too Hardโ€, and know that without Watt, there is no way this band plays this tightly and concisely, with this crackling energy. Admittedly, that comes at the expense of any kind of Stonesy raggedness.

And yet. The Stones have released an album in 2023, and it is fully credible.ย  โ€œDreamy Skiesโ€ is affecting โ€” awful title aside. By the time you reach that โ€œTumbling Diceโ€ nod in โ€œDriving Me Too Hardโ€, the momentum is too great. One could consider a very simple notion โ€“ how bad could this have been? I mean, imagine the disastrous possibilities. It could have sounded like U2โ€™s Songs of Innocence; it could have sounded like an album and a band herniating themselves into a misbegotten, unattainable relevance. But the Stones create their own relevance. And when you step away from the rockerz, you hear it.ย 

And speaking of energy, the first time I saw this footage of Lady Gagaโ€™s star turn in โ€œGimme Shelterโ€ was just after I reviewed Stef Germanotta in Montreal. One would have been forgiven for mistakenly thinking: who is this twit? Who is this weirdo in the Kiss stilt heels and the dollar-store wig strutting about the Stonesโ€™s stage? And looking back now, you are witnessing greatness. She becomes a character, in her wig and outfit, with a massive voice and personality that challenges Mick and pulls him out of the settled Stones-every-night place he was in. She does so again in โ€œSweet Sounds of Heavenโ€, bookended by the albumโ€™s two best songs. Sure, itโ€™s the Stones regardless, but my gosh, does he love having that female foil and pushback onstage.

Except when he doesnโ€™t. The last song, a cover of โ€œRolling Stone Bluesโ€, and the elegant, elegiac, โ€œTell Me Straightโ€, with Keithโ€™s solo turn performed with a level of deeply earned honesty, take Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, by themselves, back to their beginning, back to Dartford.ย Together, those two songs make a time-immemorial argument forย Hackney Diamonds:ย No matter how old or fat he is, the Champ is the Champ until you knock him out.

2024 PMA Magazine. All rights reserved.


How much did you spend on your last pair of speakers?

Dear readers,

As you might know, PMA is an independent consumer audio and music magazine that prides itself on doing things differently. For the past three years, weโ€™ve dedicated ourselves to bringing you an authentic reading experience. We steer clear of commercial influences, ensuring that what you hear from us is genuine, unfiltered, and true to our values.

However, independence comes with its challenges. To continue our journey of honest journalism and to maintain the quality of content you love, we find ourselves turning to you, our community, for support. Your contributions, no matter how small, will help us sustain our operations and continue to deliver the content you trust and enjoy. Itโ€™s your support that empowers us to remain independent and keep our ears to the ground, listening and sharing stories that matter, without any external pressures or biases.

Thank you so much for being a part of our journey.

The PMA Team

If you wish to donate, you can do so here.

Search for a Topic

and enjoy exclusive content and early offers

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Email field is required to subscribe.