Streaming vs. Lossless: Understanding Audio Formats

Streaming vs. Lossless: Understanding Audio Formats


In the ever-evolving landscape of digital music, the quest for pristine sound quality amidst the convenience of digital formats has led to the creation of an array of lossless audio codecs. These formats serve as a beacon for audiophiles and music enthusiasts alike, offering a sanctuary where the integrity of sound is preserved in its most authentic form. The genesis of lossless audio is rooted in the digital revolution’s paradox: the desire for omnipresent access to music without sacrificing the depth and richness that come with traditional analog formats like vinyl.

As the digital age dawned, and MP3s began their ascent, compressing audio files for easy distribution and storage became the norm. However, this compression came at a cost—the subtle textures and nuances of sound often got lost in translation, akin to a masterpiece painting replicated on a postage stamp. The intricacies and emotional resonances that musicians and producers meticulously crafted in the studio were diminished, prompting a counter-movement towards preserving sound fidelity.

Enter the realm of lossless audio formats, each designed with a singular purpose: to deliver sound as close to the original recording as possible, free from the compromises of compression. Formats like FLAC, ALAC, WAV, AIFF, MQA, and DSD emerged not just as technical solutions but as tributes to the art of music itself, ensuring that listeners could experience every note, breath, and beat as intended by the artists.

The development of these formats was driven by both technological advancements and a growing cultural movement valuing authenticity and quality in music consumption. As digital storage expanded and internet speeds accelerated, the feasibility of distributing and enjoying high-quality audio became a reality, paving the way for lossless formats to flourish.

The available lossless options

FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec)

Think of FLAC as the Swiss Army knife in your audio toolkit. It’s the go-to for audiophiles and music services alike, offering CD-quality sound in a package that’s more compact than other lossless formats. Its wide compatibility and open-source nature make it a democratic choice for high-quality audio. The downside? Even FLAC’s smaller files dwarf their lossy counterparts, so storage can become an issue.

  • Overview: FLAC stands as the champion of lossless formats for its balance of high-quality audio and relatively efficient file size. It’s like the Swiss Army knife of digital audio: versatile, widely supported, and uncompromising in quality.
  • Pros: Offers CD-quality audio in smaller file sizes compared to other lossless formats. It’s open-source and widely supported across various software and hardware, making it a go-to choice for many audiophiles and music services.
  • Cons: While smaller than some lossless formats, FLAC files are still significantly larger than their lossy counterparts, which might be a consideration for those with limited storage.

ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec)

ALAC is Apple’s answer to FLAC, tailored for seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem. It strikes a similar balance between sound quality and file size, making it ideal for Apple aficionados. However, its embrace outside the Apple universe isn’t as warm, potentially limiting its appeal.

  • Overview: Developed by Apple, ALAC is the lossless format of choice for users in the Apple ecosystem, providing a seamless blend of lossless quality and device integration, much like a perfectly tailored suit that fits seamlessly into your wardrobe.
  • Pros: Integrates flawlessly with Apple products and software, offering an optimal balance of sound quality and file size, akin to FLAC.
  • Cons: While it works beautifully within the Apple universe, it’s not as universally embraced outside of it, which might limit its versatility for some users.

WAV (Waveform Audio File Format)

The elder statesman of audio formats, WAV offers sound in its purest, uncompressed form. It’s universally compatible and uncompromising in quality. The trade-off is file size; WAV files are massive, making them less practical for casual listening and more a staple in professional settings.

  • Overview: The elder statesman of audio formats, WAV is a straightforward, uncompressed sound file that delivers audio in its purest form, akin to a pristine, untouched canvas.
  • Pros: Uncompressed audio means you’re getting the sound in its most authentic form, with no detail spared. It’s also universally compatible, making it a reliable choice for various applications.
  • Cons: The main drawback is file size. WAV files can be enormous, which makes them less practical for casual listening and more suited for professional settings where quality is paramount, and storage isn’t a concern.

AIFF (Audio Interchange File Format)

Developed by Apple, AIFF mirrors WAV’s commitment to pure, uncompressed audio. It’s like having a direct line to the recording studio. But, as with WAV, the luxury of uncompromised sound comes with the burden of hefty files.

  • Overview: AIFF, developed by Apple, is similar to WAV in that it offers uncompressed audio quality. It’s like having a direct line to the recording studio, with every nuance of the sound preserved.
  • Pros: Delivers top-tier, uncompressed audio quality, making it a favorite among professionals and audiophiles who demand the highest fidelity.
  • Cons: Like WAV, the file sizes are substantial, which can be a significant limitation for everyday use and storage.

MQA (Master Quality Authenticated)

MQA is the maverick of the group, offering high-resolution audio in a more manageable size, making it a compelling option for those seeking quality without the bulk. However, fully appreciating MQA’s magic requires specific hardware or software, adding a layer of complexity.

  • Overview: A newer entrant to the high-fidelity scene, MQA is a bit of a maverick. It offers an innovative approach to packaging high-resolution audio in smaller, more manageable file sizes, like a complex puzzle ingeniously fitted into a compact box.
  • Pros: MQA files are smaller and more streamable than traditional high-resolution files, making high-quality audio more accessible without sacrificing as much detail.
  • Cons: Requires specific hardware or software to fully decode and appreciate the MQA quality, which can add an extra layer of complexity for the listener.

DSD (Direct Stream Digital)

In the haute couture of audio formats, DSD stands out, offering super high-resolution sound primarily in the SACD format. It’s the pinnacle of detail and nuance for the truly discerning listener. The catch? DSD is niche, with limited playback support and hefty file sizes.

  • Overview: Diving into the deep end of audiophile territory, DSD is a format used for super high-resolution audio, primarily in the realm of SACD (Super Audio CD). It’s like the haute couture of audio formats, offering exquisite detail and depth for the discerning ear.
  • Pros: Exceptional resolution and audio quality, presenting music in its most detailed and nuanced form.
  • Cons: Very niche, with limited support in terms of playback hardware and software, and the file sizes are substantial.

When it comes to just the lossless formats, think of it like having different types of high-quality art supplies. You don’t have to commit to using only watercolors or just pencils for all your art projects. Each type has its own beauty and is better for certain kinds of artwork.

Similarly, with lossless formats like FLAC, ALAC, WAV, and others, you have options based on your needs and equipment. For example, if you use Apple products a lot, you might find ALAC really convenient since it’s designed to work seamlessly with Apple’s ecosystem. On the other hand, FLAC is super versatile and is supported by a wide range of devices and software, making it a great general-purpose choice.

Streaming Services with Lossless Options

When it comes to streaming services offering lossless audio, the landscape is burgeoning with options that cater to the discerning ears of audiophiles and music lovers alike. Here’s a breakdown of some of the top services, each with its unique strengths and considerations:

  • Pros:
    • Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) Tracks: Tidal offers an extensive collection of MQA tracks, which provide an even higher level of fidelity, often equivalent to studio-quality sound.
    • Curated Playlists and Editorial Content: Known for its artist-centric approach, Tidal provides expertly curated playlists and rich editorial content, enhancing the listening experience.
    • Integration and Compatibility: Tidal integrates well with a wide range of high-fidelity audio equipment and supports various platforms, making it a versatile choice.
  • Cons:
    • Price: Tidal’s HiFi subscription is typically more expensive compared to standard streaming options, which might be a consideration for some users.
    • Data Usage: High-resolution streaming can consume significant data, which could be a concern for those with limited internet plans.
  • Pros:
    • High-Resolution Audio: Qobuz stands out for offering true high-resolution audio files, surpassing CD quality in many cases, which is a boon for audiophiles seeking the best possible sound.
    • Purchase Options: Unique among streaming services, Qobuz allows users to purchase and download albums in high-resolution formats, appealing to collectors and those looking to own their music.
    • Extensive Catalogue: With a focus on classical and jazz, Qobuz offers an expansive library, including niche and hard-to-find tracks.
  • Cons:
    • Availability: Qobuz’s availability is limited to certain regions, which might restrict access for some users.
    • Interface and User Experience: Some users find Qobuz’s user interface less intuitive compared to other streaming services, potentially impacting usability.
  • Pros:
    • Affordability: Amazon Music HD offers competitive pricing for its lossless and high-resolution streaming service, making it an attractive option for those looking to explore high-fidelity audio without a hefty price tag.
    • Seamless Integration with Amazon Ecosystem: For users already invested in Amazon’s ecosystem, including Echo devices and Fire TV, Amazon Music HD integrates seamlessly, enhancing convenience.
    • Extensive Library: Amazon Music HD boasts a vast library of songs, including a wide range of lossless tracks, catering to diverse musical tastes.
  • Cons:
    • Sound Quality Variability: While Amazon Music HD offers high-resolution tracks, some users report variability in the perceived quality of the lossless audio.
    • Interface Clutter: The user interface can be cluttered, making navigation and discovery slightly less user-friendly compared to more streamlined services.

Each of these services offers a gateway to high-fidelity audio, bringing the nuances and richness of lossless music to a wider audience. The choice between them often boils down to personal preferences, budget considerations, and specific needs, such as integration with existing devices or interest in particular music genres. Exploring what each platform has to offer can help you find the perfect soundtrack to your digital life in crystal-clear lossless audio.

The Role of Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs)

In the journey from digital music files to the analog sound we hear, Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) are the unsung heroes that bridge two worlds. Every digital device that outputs sound, from smartphones to computers, contains a DAC, but the quality can vary dramatically, affecting the ultimate sound experience.

A DAC’s primary function is to convert digital audio data—essentially a series of 0s and 1s—into an analog signal that can drive headphones or speakers to produce sound. This process involves two critical steps: ‘sampling’ the digital file to measure the audio signal at discrete intervals, and then ‘quantizing’ these samples by assigning them specific amplitude values based on the file’s bit depth.

High-quality standalone DACs are sought after in the audiophile world for several reasons:

  • Improved Sound Quality: They often provide a noticeable upgrade in sound clarity, detail, and depth compared to the built-in DACs in most consumer electronics.
  • Reduced Noise and Distortion: Superior DACs are engineered to minimize electrical noise and distortion that can muddy the audio, offering a cleaner and more precise sound.
  • Versatility and Compatibility: High-end DACs come equipped with various inputs and outputs, allowing them to serve as the centerpiece of a complex audio setup, connecting different digital sources to a range of amplifiers and speakers.

Investing in a quality DAC can transform your listening experience, revealing nuances in your favorite tracks that you might never have noticed before. It’s like swapping out a cloudy, scratched lens for a clear, high-definition one, bringing the entire musical landscape into sharper focus.

An Eversolo DMP-A6 Master, a very popular DAC (among other things).

Understanding Bit Depth and Sample Rate

Bit depth and sample rate are fundamental concepts in digital audio that determine the accuracy and quality of sound reproduction. Together, they define the resolution of digital audio, much like how pixels determine the clarity of a digital image.

  • Bit Depth: This refers to the number of bits used to describe each sample in a piece of audio. Think of it as the audio equivalent of color depth in an image; just as more colors can depict an image more accurately, a higher bit depth allows for a more precise representation of sound. Specifically, bit depth determines the dynamic range of the audio—the difference between the quietest and loudest sounds that can be captured. A common bit depth is 16 bits for CD quality, offering a dynamic range of about 96 dB, while 24-bit audio extends this range to 144 dB, allowing for greater nuance and detail in the sound.
  • Sample Rate: This is the frequency at which the audio signal is sampled, or measured, per second. A higher sample rate means more measurements of the sound wave per second, which results in a more accurate representation of the original analog wave. CD quality audio uses a sample rate of 44.1kHz, meaning the audio is sampled 44,100 times per second. Higher-resolution formats might use 96kHz or even 192kHz, capturing even more detail in the audio signal, especially in the higher frequencies.

Understanding these parameters is crucial for appreciating the fidelity of lossless audio formats. Together, bit depth and sample rate define the “canvas” on which the music is painted, with higher values offering a larger and more nuanced space for audio expression. However, it’s important to note that the benefits of increasing these values have practical limits, with the improvements becoming less perceptible beyond certain thresholds, and dependent on the listening environment and equipment quality.

Additional Questions You Might Have

What constitutes the standard for high-fidelity (HiFi) sound in analog formats, and from which source—vinyl records or CDs—does the highest quality analog audio originate?

In the realm of analog HiFi, the “standard” can be a bit subjective and often comes down to personal preference and the specific setup used. However, vinyl records and CDs represent two key mediums in the analog and digital audio landscapes, respectively, each with their unique charm and fidelity characteristics.

Vinyl Records

Vinyl is often celebrated for its warmth and richness in sound. The analog nature of vinyl means that the sound is produced by a physical process – a needle tracing the grooves of the record, which many argue captures the essence of a live performance more intimately. This warmth and “presence” are what many audiophiles cherish about vinyl, claiming it provides the best analog sound experience. The larger album artwork and tactile nature of handling records add to the overall sensory experience of vinyl listening.


While CDs are technically digital, they’re often included in discussions about HiFi standards due to their pivotal role in high-fidelity audio history. Introduced in the early 1980s, CDs were marketed as providing “perfect sound forever,” with a clarity and absence of background noise that was a significant leap from the analog formats of the time. CD audio is sampled at 44.1kHz (the sample rate) with a bit depth of 16 bits, which was established as the Red Book standard. This standard was a significant improvement in audio clarity and fidelity compared to vinyl and cassette tapes.

The Best Analog Sound

Determining where the best analog sound comes from can be complex. Vinyl enthusiasts argue that the analog signal path from the vinyl grooves to your ears retains a certain authenticity and warmth that digital formats can’t replicate. This includes the subtle nuances of the music, such as the ambient sounds from the recording room, that vinyl purportedly captures more naturally.

On the other hand, proponents of digital formats like CDs point to the precision, clarity, and lack of surface noise (pops and crackles associated with vinyl) as advantages that contribute to high-fidelity audio. CDs also don’t degrade over time with playback, unlike vinyl, which can wear down with repeated playing.

Ultimately, the “best” source of sound might come down to personal preference, the quality of the recording itself, and the audio equipment used for playback. High-quality turntables, speakers, and amplifiers can make vinyl records sound heavenly, just as a top-tier CD player and DAC can reveal the immaculate details in a CD. For true HiFi enthusiasts, the joy often lies in the pursuit of that perfect sound, whether it comes from the grooves of a vinyl record or the pits of a CD.

What Is Lossy?

“Lossy” refers to a type of data compression used in digital audio (and other media) where some of the file’s original data is lost during the compression process. This is done to significantly reduce the file size, making it easier to store and stream music over the internet. However, this efficiency comes at the cost of sound quality.

When an audio file is compressed using a lossy format—like MP3, AAC, or OGG Vorbis—algorithms remove parts of the sound data that are considered less important or less noticeable to the human ear. For instance, very quiet sounds that are masked by louder ones in a similar frequency range might be removed, based on the assumption that listeners won’t miss them.

The result is a much smaller file that still sounds close to the original to most listeners, especially when played through standard everyday speakers or headphones. The degree to which the quality is affected depends on the compression level chosen; higher compression rates result in smaller files but more noticeable loss of quality.

Lossy formats are incredibly popular due to their balance of sound quality and file size, making them ideal for streaming services, portable media players, and other situations where storage space or bandwidth is limited. However, for critical listening or in high-quality audio setups, the difference between lossy and lossless formats can become more apparent, with lossless providing a more detailed and rich listening experience.

Can I hear the difference between lossless and lossy formats?

Whether you can hear the difference depends on various factors, including the quality of your audio equipment, the listening environment, and your own hearing sensitivity. Some people will notice a significant improvement with lossless formats, especially in terms of clarity, depth, and the presence of subtle details in the music. Others might find the differences less pronounced, particularly when listening on everyday consumer-grade equipment or in noisy environments.

If you’re using high-end headphones or speakers, a quality DAC can enhance your listening experience by providing a cleaner, more accurate sound. For everyday listening on standard equipment, the built-in DAC in most devices is generally sufficient, and you might not notice a significant improvement. However, for audiophiles seeking the best possible sound, investing in a good DAC is always worth it.


In the harmonious world of lossless audio, the journey from digital files to the rich tapestry of sound we experience is a symphony of technology, craftsmanship, and personal preference. From the meticulous conversion of Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) that breathe life into the 0s and 1s, to the intricate dance of bit depth and sample rate that define the canvas of our musical experiences, each element plays a pivotal role in crafting the ultimate listening experience. As we navigate the vast seas of lossless formats, streaming services, and the gear that brings them to life, it’s clear that the pursuit of perfect sound is as much about the journey as it is the destination—a quest for clarity, depth, and a personal connection to the music that moves us.

2024 PMA Magazine. All rights reserved.

Dear readers,

As you might know, PMA is an independent consumer audio and music magazine that prides itself on doing things differently. For the past three years, we’ve dedicated ourselves to bringing you an authentic listening experience. Our commitment? Absolute authenticity. We steer clear of commercial influences, ensuring that what you hear from us is genuine, unfiltered, and true to our values.

However, independence comes with its challenges. To continue our journey of honest journalism and to maintain the quality of content you love, we find ourselves turning to you, our community, for support. Your contributions, no matter how small, will help us sustain our operations and continue to deliver the content you trust and enjoy. It’s your support that empowers us to remain independent and keep our ears to the ground, listening and sharing stories that matter, without any external pressures or biases.

Thank you so much for being a part of our journey.

The PMA Team

If you wish to donate, you can do so here.

Search for a Topic

and receive our flipbook magazines early


Email field is required to subscribe.