
It was early Sunday morning when I met veteran audio critic Michael Fremer, aka Mikey, suitcase in hand, preparing to return home from his visit to the Montreal Audiofest. Heโd been invited by the showโs organisers to present his popular turntable setup seminar along with the showโs annual Lifetime Achievement Awards, conferred on those whoโve made significant contributions to the audio industry. What Mikey didnโt expect was that he himself would be bestowed the award in recognition of his decades-long contributions to audio reviewing and his unwavering championing of vinyl playback.
โThat was totally out of the blue. I had no idea that was happening,โ Mikey says after I congratulate him on his win. โThey kind of ambushed me.โ
In this exclusive interview with PMA Magazineโs Gilles Laferriere, Mikey speaks franklyโwith the opinionated eye of a critic, but at times poignantlyโabout a variety of things he feels compelled to get off his chest, including how Audiofest exhibitors should up their game, the importance of manufacturer longevity, and his return to The Absolute Sound following his split from Stereophile.
I ask Mikey why heโs never been to the Montreal Audiofest, now in its 34th edition, until now.
โItโs right around my birthday and my wife insists that I stay home for my birthday,โ he says. โThis year was special, so I came. And itโs fun. Itโs a great show. The people, the hotel, ย everything about it is great. I really had a good time, and the gala last night was insane! In America, in half the states, having an event with a Drag Queen on stage would be illegal. Itโs pathetic.
โThe vibe here is lower key, and everybodyโs happier. Itโs very tough right now in the US. The country is split apart in a very bad way. And itโs not just political. Itโs split apart because half the people have different sets of facts. They donโt believe things. What happened on January 6โa lot of people donโt think it happened.
โAnd a lot of people in power who know better are just playing it out. Iโve never seen anything like it. But anyway, the hi-fi is good.โ

His vote for best audio show in the world?
โHigh End Munich is something unto itself. Thereโs really nothing like it, because when you go there in the spring, thatโs when business happens for the whole industry. And you really see that itโs a large-scale industry. You see big businesses there year after yearโthe same big companies. Theyโre surviving. Theyโre building products, theyโre selling and distributing all over the world.
โAnd the show is open for consumers, too, which is really interesting. Consumers get to see the business side of it, which I think gives them a certain sense of confidence that if they invest in a product, the chances are itโll be supported over the years. And thatโs something I think consumers have to take into accountโa companyโs longevity. Consider what kind of investment youโre making. What are you going to have in five years if that companyโs gone?
โThere are a lot of mom-and-pop businesses at the smaller regional shows in the States, and it becomes a point of contention for the bigger stores that invest and come there and show their gear. They say to themselves, โwhy am I supporting this show? Iโm allowing these little guys to come in and steal my business and sell out the back door and not pay sales tax and I lose business and Iโm paying for it.โ That tension is coming to a head this year. I think a lot of the big stores that would normally exhibit at AXPONA are not coming for that reason. And AXPONA canโt not have these little stores. These little dealers and little manufacturers are their bread and butter. Itโs going to be an issue thatโs going to get worse over time.
โAnother fantastic show is the one in Warsaw. The Poles are music lovers. Their airport is called Frederick Chopin. In America, if you named an airport for Frederick Chopin, you know what people would say? Hey, whoโs this chopping guy? What is he chopping? Is his blade sharp?โ
What did he think about the Hong Kong show?
โA great show. Also on a whole different level, with a focus on classical music and frequented by serious music lovers. But for political reasons, I wonโt attend it anymore. If I say the wrong thing, I could get arrested, and I often say the wrong thing. Maybe Iโll go back one day, weโll see.โ
General consensus on the exhibits at the Montreal Audiofest?
โAs a critic, I noticed a lot wrong with the way exhibitors showed their products,โ he says. โThere should be better lighting. Signage was terrible. If you have people coming into your room, there should be a sign next to each product. It doesnโt have to be detailed, but hereโs the name of it, the brand, hereโs what it does, hereโs what it costs.
โAnd each room should have a component sheet. Okay, itโs important for me, as a reviewer, to have one, but there should be one for the consumer, too. Their head is going to spin from this show, so they should be able to go home and go, โoh yeah, there was this, and this, and hereโs what it costs. Now I remember that room.โ
โAnd when I walk into a room, and I see whoeverโs manning the room just staring at their cell phone or computer, not engaging with visitors, thatโs not good. I walked into a big room of a company that invited me there in an email. I walked in and was taking pictures, obviously not just a guy sitting down. And the guy that was at the computer looked up and saw me and looked back down, ignoring me. So, I went through the whole room with video, and then I walked out. Iโm not trying to say Iโm somebody special, but they invited me into this room. I donโt want to have to go, โhey, Iโm hereโ. But this guy just sat there at his computer.
โExhibitors should engage every visitor. And they donโt do it. Theyโre paying all this money to come here, and they donโt take advantage of their opportunity.โ
What about the sound of the rooms in general? โHotel rooms are notoriously bad,โ he said. โSome people can get good sound in a hotel room. Thatโs a miracle. If the exhibitor got good sound in a tiny little boxy room, good for them. But itโs why I donโt review equipment under show conditions.โ
โ2022 was an eventful year in your career,โ I say.
โYes. I left Stereophile and returned to The Absolute Sound.โ
โDo you want to tell us what happened?โ

โSure. (in 1986) I started my career at The Absolute Sound (TAS), where I was the music editor. I got to review a few pieces of equipment, but not much. Harry Pearson mentored me. The first piece of equipment I reviewed was a pair of speakers. I wrote the review and mailed it to Harry, who sent it back with โno, no, noโ written all over it in red pencil. I had to rework the review six times before it was publishable. When it was, the speaker company was out of business! (laughs) I learned so much just by reading the magazine.
โBut I had to leave TAS because it was kind of going under at that point. By then, I had made enemies of everybody at Stereophile because I was such a bulldog for Harry and TAS and the culture the magazine represented, which I felt Stereophile didnโt have, even though it was a good magazine. But I had to leave, and John Atkinson was kind enough to give me the opportunity to write for his magazine when he could have easily said no.โ
Not everyone at team Stereophile was thrilled about Mikeyโs arrival. โI went to one of Stereophileโs annual CES-type parties, when (late magazine advertising executive) Ken Nelson, who walked with a cane, used his cane to block my entrance and said, โYouโre not coming in here, Mikey, youโre an enemy.โ Wow, okay. I donโt mind making enemies. If youโre afraid of making enemies, donโt be a critic, be a publicist.
โSo, John asked me what I wanted to write, and I said an analogue column, to which he replied that Iโd be writing myself out of a column because analogue was going to go away in a couple of years. I said if analogue goes away, Iโll change jobs. John accepted and asked how much I wanted to be paid for it. I gave him a price, which wasnโt a lot of moneyโIโve consistently, in my life, undervalued myself, which is a self esteem issue that Iโll deal with in my older age.
โSix months later, Larry Archibald, who co-owned the magazine with John, contacted me to say they were doubling my pay. They saw the result of what I was bringing to the magazine, which I didnโt but they did. For that, Iโll forever be grateful to John and Larry.
โAt some point, I saw my career ascending and people paying attention to me. Iโd come to these shows and people wanted to take pictures with me and they thanked me and it was a fantastic feeling. I never thought my work would become that kind of thing. Things were going well, but eventually I needed more money and they didnโt have more for me.
โSo, while I was still writing for Stereophile, (in 1995) I started my own print magazine, The Tracking Angle, which ran for four years. It was difficult because we couldnโt get advertising. We were promoting a physical medium just when the record industry consolidated and didnโt care about that anymore. I lost some money, but it was worth it considering what I did and because I had all that content I could put online. I started my own website, musicangle.com, and was growing that while Stereophile was getting sold repeatedly. The owners at Stereophile, those before the current ones, told me they werenโt happy that I had a website, because I was diluting my brand. I said โyeah, Iโm diluting my brand, and Iโm growing my bank account, which is a fair trade to me.
โThey then made me an offer to become an employee. Iโd never been an employee. Even when I supervised the (movie) soundtrack to Tron for Disney, I was always an independent contractor.
โAnd over the ten years I was a paid employee, I continued building my brand. I built a website (analogplanet.com) from scratch. I named it, I got the writers, I did the whole thing. I built a YouTube channel. I wasnโt hired to do a YouTube channel, but I thought thatโs something you have to do today. I built it up to 52,000 subscribers when Stereophileโs YouTube channel had 3000 to 4000 subscribers.
โI always put in the extra effort. Always. It was good for the magazine and I felt entitled to more money. But the new owner said no, I was too expensive. So thatโs what happened.โ
Michael then hesitates and gets visibly choked up. After taking a moment to collect himself, he clears his throat and continues.
Read Part 2 here.
Leave a Reply