The Night Ed Sullivan Swore Off the Rolling Stones (But Couldn’t)

The Night Ed Sullivan Swore Off the Rolling Stones (But Couldn’t)


In the autumn of 1964, America was a cauldron bubbling over with change. The civil rights movement was in full swing, the Vietnam War was escalating, and the Beatles had already ignited a British Invasion that left teenagers screaming and parents scratching their heads. But on October 25th, a new kind of British export hit American airwavesโ€”a band that didnโ€™t want to hold your hand but wanted to set your soul on fire. The Rolling Stones stepped onto The Ed Sullivan Show stage, and television would never be the same.

But letโ€™s rewind a bit. Just months earlier, The Rolling Stones were relatively unknown on this side of the pond. While theyโ€™d been stirring up a sonic revolution in โ€œSwinging Londonโ€ with their hard-driving blues sound, their first U.S. tour was, in the blunt words of bassist Bill Wyman, โ€œ[It was] a disaster. When we arrived, we didnโ€™t have a hit record or anything going for us.โ€ America wasnโ€™t readyโ€”or so it seemedโ€”for the raw energy these Brits were ready to unleash.

That all changed with the release of their second U.S. album, 12 X 5, and the single โ€œTime Is On My Side,โ€ which climbed its way to number six on the U.S. charts. Sensing the tides turning, their savvy manager Andrew Loog Oldhamโ€”whoโ€™d cut his teeth working as a publicist for The Beatlesโ€”knew exactly what needed to happen next. They had to conquer American television, and there was no bigger platform than The Ed Sullivan Show.

On the evening of October 25th, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Brian Jones, Bill Wyman, and Charlie Watts found themselves backstage at CBS Studio 50. They were a world away from the gritty clubs of London, now surrounded by the eclectic acts that made up Sullivanโ€™s variety hourโ€”comedy duo Stiller and Meara cracking wise, and a young Israeli violin prodigy named Itzhak Perlman tuning his strings. The juxtaposition was almost poetic: the old guard meeting the new rebels.

As they awaited their cue, the Stones could hear the muffled sounds of the audienceโ€”teenage energy barely contained, like a kettle about to whistle. Ed Sullivan, Americaโ€™s quintessential host, introduced them to an audience already teetering on the edge of frenzy. The curtain lifted, and the Stones launched into Chuck Berryโ€™s โ€œAround and Around.โ€ This wasnโ€™t just a cover; it was a declaration. Mickโ€™s youthful face, all pout and provocation, framed by the innocent-looking but wickedly grinning Keith and Brian, became the visual anthem of rebellion.

The reaction was instantaneous. The crowd erupted, their screams threatening to drown out the amplifiers. Mick tried to sing over the cacophony, wriggling and strutting across the stage with a confidence that belied his age. When the song ended, the curtain dropped, but the audienceโ€™s decibel level did not. Ed Sullivan, ever the professional, attempted to introduce the next act but found himself competing with a tidal wave of teenage hysteria.

โ€œQuiet!โ€ he barked, his patience wearing thin. It was like trying to put a lid on a volcano. The show must go on, and so it didโ€”with the Kim Sisters and the acrobatic Berosini family gamely performing to an audience that only had ears for the Rolling Stones.

When the band returned to close the show with โ€œTime Is On My Side,โ€ they seized the moment with both hands. Mick leaned into the microphone, his eyes flickering with mischief as he played the crowd like an instrument. Every hip shake, every sly grin sent waves of electric rebellion through the studio. Ed Sullivan, perhaps naively, encouraged the crowd: โ€œCome on, let them hear it!โ€ The resulting roar made his brief post-performance chat with Mick entirely inaudibleโ€”a fitting end to a performance that was less about words and all about raw, unfiltered emotion.

The aftermath was a whirlwind. The Rolling Stones had arrived, and America couldnโ€™t look away. Ticket sales for their fall tour skyrocketed, reportedly generating over a million dollarsโ€”a staggering sum for the time. But with fame came infamy. Conservative viewers flooded CBS with complaints. One telegram fumed, โ€œShould be ashamed of yourself putting on such trash as The Rolling Stones. A Disappointed Viewer.โ€ The band couldnโ€™t have asked for better publicity.

Ed Sullivan, visibly rattled by the chaos, allegedly swore theyโ€™d never grace his stage again. But in show business, ratings talk louder than principles. The uproar only amplified the publicโ€™s fascination, and Sullivanโ€”ever the savvy businessmanโ€”invited them back not once but five more times. Each appearance pushed the envelope further, solidifying their status as rock โ€˜nโ€™ roll royalty.

So why did this performance hit such a nerve? The Stones didnโ€™t just bring a different sound; they brought a different attitude. Where the Beatles were charming and approachable, the Stones were dangerous and unapologetic. They drew from the muddy waters of American blues, refracting it through a lens of youthful defiance. This wasnโ€™t just music; it was a statement.

Their Ed Sullivan debut was a cultural lightning rod. It signaled a shift from the polished veneer of early โ€™60s pop to something grittier, more authentic. The bandโ€™s rough edges werenโ€™t flaws to be smoothed out but features to be celebrated. They embodied the restless spirit of a generation questioning authority and seeking something real in a world of plastic smiles and canned laughter. It challenged the status quo, blurred the lines between acceptable and taboo, and opened the floodgates for artists who didnโ€™t fit the mold. The reverberations of that performance can still be felt today every time a musician dares to defy expectations on live TV.

In a world now saturated with manufactured outrage and cookie-cutter pop stars, itโ€™s almost quaint to think of a band causing such a stir simply by being themselves. But thatโ€™s the legacy of the Rolling Stonesโ€™ first Ed Sullivan gigโ€”a reminder that sometimes, all it takes is a few chords and the courage to be authentic to change the cultural conversation.

2024 PMA Magazine. All rights reserved.

PMA Poll: How much did you spend on your last pair of speakers?
Search for a Topic

and enjoy exclusive content and early offers

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Email field is required to subscribe.