My Morning at the 50th Anniversary WATT/Puppy Launch

My Morning at the 50th Anniversary WATT/Puppy Launch


Photos by Robert Schryer except where otherwise indicated.

Iโ€™d never listened to the WATT/Puppy speaker before, but, of course, as an audiophile, Iโ€™d heard of it, although not in the last few years, the reason for which will be revealed in a moment. But I always wanted to hear it, so having been offered the chance to audition this iconic modelโ€™s 50th Anniversary editionโ€”so-designated to commemorate the companyโ€™s founding in 1974โ€”at Montrealโ€™s landmark Filtronique audio store as part of the speakerโ€™s global launch, I jumped at it.

At $48,000 a pair (US$ 38,000/pair), the WATT/Puppy doesnโ€™t quite suit my pocketbook, so to speak, but it does, apparently, suit those of many other people; Wilsonโ€™s Bill Peugh, who was at the launch, told me the company had barely started taking orders for the WATT/Puppy and already itโ€™s proven a best-seller, with consumers prepared to wait 3 months to receive a speaker they havenโ€™t even heard. It speaks of peopleโ€™s trust in the Wilson Audio company, co-founded by the late David Wilson and his wife Sheryl Lee, and of the WATT/Puppy legacy, which spanned from 1995 to 2011, through models 1 to 8*. Gone now is the numerical sequencingโ€”the new WATT/Puppy, a design brought to fruition by Davidโ€™s son, Daryl, an apple that, by all accounts, fell very close to the tree, is named, simply, the WATT/Puppy. The speakerโ€™s cabinet will sport a 50th Anniversary medallion until the end of the year, after which the model will continue to be sold without the medallion but otherwise be unchanged.

Looking spiffy in a creaseless blue suit, Bill delivered a fascinating summary of the companyโ€™s past and philosophical underpinningsโ€”about how its speakers were often named after the family dogs, how Sheryl Lee turned her husbandโ€™s creations into a business, and how the company never believed in trickle-down technology. โ€œWe try to make every model the best it can be,โ€ said Bill. โ€œAs soon as we discover how to make something better for a model, every following model, regardless of where it stands in our line-up, will receive the same improvement.โ€ Cost is also not a factor in determining if an improvement will be implemented. โ€œWe donโ€™t think in terms of โ€˜hey, this speaker has to meet this price pointโ€™,โ€ Bill said. โ€œIf a cone material that costs more to make sounds better, it will be used.โ€

The WATT/Puppy speakers being demoed at Filtronique came in the modelโ€™s beautiful Pur Sang Rouge โ€œUpgradeโ€ finishโ€”finishes come in three ranges: โ€œStandardโ€, โ€œUpgradeโ€, and โ€œPremium Pearlโ€. Upstream components included a digital front-end by DCS and electronics by Nagra, with cabling by Synergistic Research.

Bill treated the listening gallery to a variety of music that included a male choir singing a cappella, the Rolling Stones, Melody Gardot, Nirvana, Stravinsky, and Bill Evans. What struck me most about the cross-section of recordings played was how, as revealed through WATT/Puppy, each sounded different but still compellingly musical. Transparency was off the charts, revealing a soundstage that was intricately layered and dimensional. Images were bold, starkly defined, and protuberant. I heard deep, well-controlled bass and a rich tonal palette. By the end of the presentation, I was, in a word, smitten.

After his presentation, Bill was kind enough to afford me time to interview him. He and I sat on a sofa together in a closed-off storage room. Despite his whirlwind schedule, Bill sounded thoughtful and unrushed throughout our interview.

I began by asking if any other Wilson model would receive the 50th Anniversary designation.

The 50th Anniversary medallion (photo courtesy of Wilson Audio)

Bill: โ€œThe Watt/Puppy has a designation of 50 years because it was introduced in the companyโ€™s 50th year. There wonโ€™t be, as far as I know, another product coming out this year.โ€

Did he consider product reviews still important to a productโ€™s sales?

โ€œIt depends on where a company is in its life, and how well itโ€™s done to build its brand, its customer base, its dealer-and-distribution base, โ€ he said. โ€œIf youโ€™re a young company, exhibiting at audio shows and getting reviews can be critical. For the more established companies, itโ€™s certainly important to get reviews, but they wonโ€™t make or break you.

โ€œLook at what we did with the WATT/Puppy [for the global launch],โ€ he continued. โ€œPutting it in 75 locations, not giving it to a reviewer [but rather] to the people who are our partners in this. For the most part, thatโ€™s what we do at Wilson Audioโ€”events with our dealers that are targeted to people who have an interest in our products. What we found is that when dealers do these more targeted things, they get to spend time with people, valuable time.โ€

What was the final design that Dave worked on and the first design that Daryl did?

โ€œThe final for Dave would be the WAMM. Thatโ€™s why we donโ€™t touch it. Thereโ€™s not going to be another version of the WAMM. Thatโ€™s Daveโ€™s Magnus Opus. In fact, we had some people who wanted us to [continue its evolution] because itโ€™s our best speaker and they were very upset when we said no.โ€

โ€œYou retired the model?โ€ I asked.

โ€œItโ€™s still available. People can still buy it. But at its price, it doesnโ€™t sell as often as a WATT/Puppy obviouslyโ€, he said. โ€œAs far as Darylโ€™s first full-range stereo speaker design that was all his, that would be the Alexx, in 2016.โ€

Was Daryl the head of the team that designed the new Watt/Puppy?

โ€œOf course. Heโ€™s the head of design for everything.โ€

Since the WATT/Puppy 8 was launched over a decade ago, did the new WATT/Puppy represent some sort of departure for the model?

โ€œNo. The WATT/Puppy 8 morphed into the Sasha WATT/Puppy. The thing is, as we were going up the line, the Sasha WATT/Puppy became Sasha 2, became Sasha DAW, became Sasha V. [The speaker] got bigger. One of the WATT/Puppyโ€™s claims to fame was its size. If you look at the new WATT/Puppy, itโ€™s narrower than Sasha V, along with being about 5โ€ shallower and about 4โ€ shorter. So itโ€™s substantially smaller. There are people who will put it visually where they wonโ€™t put a Sasha V.โ€

The original WATT/Puppy (photo courtesy of Wilson Audio)

โ€œSo this WATT/Puppy would never be called the 9?โ€ I asked.

โ€œNot by us. Itโ€™s the Watt Puppy.โ€

Was there one particular improvement made to the WATT/Puppy that brought about the biggest change in sound quality over previous models?

โ€œWe build on what we know,โ€ said Bill. โ€œWe donโ€™t run out and do things differently. We have a platform that is basically generally defined. What we did with the WATT/Puppy is we took the concepts that made WATT/Puppy and applied what we know today to making the best WATT/Puppy so far.โ€

ย โ€œSo, tweaking things here and thereโ€”?โ€ I asked.

โ€œNo,โ€ he said. โ€œWe donโ€™t tweak anything. Tweaking isโ€”and this is a personal thingโ€”โ€™tweakingโ€™ is the worst word in audio. It indicates that I donโ€™t know what Iโ€™m doing and Iโ€™m going to throw crap at the wall and hope something sticks.โ€

He added: โ€œDaryl has, at this point, 45 years of documentationโ€”thick notebooks of everything Dave had ever learned or done building speakers. We document everything to the nth degree. When you have that level of documentation, you do things that make sense to do going forward, and you get either the expected result or not, but thereโ€™s no throwing things at the wall.โ€

โ€œSo itโ€™s a continuation of whatโ€™s already been established,โ€ I said.

โ€œExactly. Thatโ€™s why we donโ€™t do trickle down,โ€ he said. โ€œWe do trickle forward. Everything we know is available to [improve] that product. Take the WATT/Puppy from a decade and a half ago. We know a lot more now than we knew then. A lot of thatโ€™s now available, as you can see in the drivers, the capacitors, the materials.โ€

The WATT/Puppy has also gotten more attractive, I told him.

โ€œThatโ€™s Daryl,โ€ he said. โ€œ(founder) Dave was very much form follows function. Darylโ€™s got some artist in him. We begged him not to put too many curves in it, or else nobody would remember itโ€™s a WATT/Puppy.โ€

In North America, Wilson Audio has 36 US dealers and four Canadian ones. Was the company looking to establish more dealers in Canada?

โ€œWe look for dealers, not markets,โ€ he replied. โ€œWe have an unusually high expectation of what a dealer has to do. Weโ€™re not very nice about, shall we say, dealers who wouldnโ€™t follow that practice. Weโ€™re very customer-centric. If someone calls in with a problem, and we give the dealer a call, we expect that dealer to take no longer than 24 hours to get in touch with that customerโ€”and preferably that day.

โ€œThe dealer has to install every speaker using the WASP (Wilson Audio Setup Procedure) speaker placement process.โ€

โ€œSo the WASP process is still being used?โ€ I asked.

โ€œThereโ€™s nothing better,โ€ he said. โ€œWhy wouldnโ€™t we?โ€

Spotted: the SabrinaX holding court in one of Filtroniqueโ€™s listening rooms

Wilsonโ€™s biggest-selling speaker?

โ€œThe SabrinaX,โ€ Bill said. โ€œActually, today it would be the WATT/Puppy. Any time you launch a speaker, particularly at a lower price range, it does that. The WATT/Puppy probably will be our best-seller for the next two years, just because of where it is on the curve, and where the SabrinaX is. Each product has a curve that it follows, and the WATT/Puppy is in its launch phase.โ€

Did he have a favourite Wilson Audio design?

โ€œIt depends. There are things the WAMM does that nothing else can do. There are things (Chronosonic) XVX does that the WAMM canโ€™t quite do. We donโ€™t talk much about that, but there are [differences], and part of that has to do with the midrange driver.

He continued: โ€œIn the real world, I love the idea of a smaller loudspeaker, so for me, the WATT/Puppy, though itโ€™s not as resolved as an Alexia, [and the fact] it can visually go into a smaller room where a Sasha couldnโ€™t, thatโ€™s probably going to be a speaker I own.โ€

With a grin and a twinkle in his eye, he added: โ€œBut I also own the Sasha V.โ€

*Technically, there was no model 4; the number 4 is considered unlucky in Asia.

2024 PMA Magazine. All rights reserved.


How much did you spend on your last pair of speakers?

Dear readers,

As you might know, PMA is an independent consumer audio and music magazine that prides itself on doing things differently. For the past three years, weโ€™ve dedicated ourselves to bringing you an authentic reading experience. We steer clear of commercial influences, ensuring that what you hear from us is genuine, unfiltered, and true to our values.

However, independence comes with its challenges. To continue our journey of honest journalism and to maintain the quality of content you love, we find ourselves turning to you, our community, for support. Your contributions, no matter how small, will help us sustain our operations and continue to deliver the content you trust and enjoy. Itโ€™s your support that empowers us to remain independent and keep our ears to the ground, listening and sharing stories that matter, without any external pressures or biases.

Thank you so much for being a part of our journey.

The PMA Team

If you wish to donate, you can do so here.

Search for a Topic

and enjoy exclusive content and early offers

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Email field is required to subscribe.